I have to agree with most comments that there isn't a lot of value in these bills , but please don't just take them to the bank as that will only result in them being destroyed. I true collector is probably looking for bills of that age in better condition, but a bill like those can be great starter...

If it is a tombac you have a coin worth somthing all right, im no expert and will be interested to see what some on this site think but is it possably a coin that has just some toning . will be watching any comments

Point taken coinguy, if your trying to sell them bulk you would need to go on a average.

dadhoards, a few days ago i was asking the question of how to tell a 1967 80% silver dime from a 50'% Bill in Burl indicated the drop test, the one with the highest pitch ring is the higher silver content. you might be able to get a better idea of how much silver you have there. And to your question...

Just wondering if anyone out there can tell me if there is a way to know the difference between a %50 silver or a %80 silver 1967 dime. other then analysis of the metals.

colkern , very nice looking notes. sorry cant help with getting them Graded . But you cant keep us wondering "you Won them" I wish i could be so lucky

Had not noticed that "wiser3'
another tie in to the 1943 Tombac.
i prefer no color on coins but will probably try and get one for the collection if i get a chance.
Looking forward to the day that coin shows and 'in person" auctions are back.

As is so often mentioned , Would be great to see a photo of this Coin.

Great job with the photos . And welcome to the forum

Thanks for your inputs , it isnt a big thing i just thought it would be easier to determine if you had a thick or thin planchet by its weight rather then trying to measure it thickness. and yes coinguy i thought they were 100% nickel till i read the RCM report that henrysmedford highlighted!!!!!!!

thanks but seems strange 1968 to 1982 they used a planchet 2.62 mm thick then 1982 to 1986 the planchet was only 2.55 mm but the weight did not change, 15.62 g i guess the one planchet was 99% Nickel and the other 99.9% nickel I wonder what the other metal was to make up the last 1% to .1%

Just noticed in the Price guide and Values on this web site they indicate Two different Planchets used in 1982, A Thin Planchet used for some of the coins . Can anyone tell me was there any difference in the weight of the two Planchets. If i'm not mistaken ( i have been before) they continued using ...

Can’t say I have heard of anyplace in sask. or man. But I believe there is in Calgary, hopefully there is someone out there that can give you a better answer.

I would have to agree , with only 21135 of the 1947ml made it’s surprising that the don’t demand a higher value!!! And I think I have seem more of the 1948 for sale on auction sites then I ever have the 1947ml.
Anyone out there have a explanation???

Coin guy your technically correct but I’m a bit with LDW, I have a hard time not calling a 5 cent coin a nickel . The 5 cent coin made today is still a nickel to me . Hard for me to break old habits.