Question about detail versus clear,nick free field
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 9:18 pm
Hi:
I have a few Canadian silver dollars, Queen Elizabeth II 1953-1964....one which has been graded by a third party grading service which gave this particular dollar a MS-64 grade.
My other dollar coins that have the same effigy,but different dates,certainly have better detail than the TPG one,particularly the third-from-bottom pair of laurel leaves,which are basically worn away on the 'graded' coin,but on my other coins the whole five pairs of leaves and the leaf on the end is still visible.
The only difference is the field area ( I think that's what it's called),or the area that has nothing on it,around the image is more shiny and less 'nick-free' on the "graded" coin... so what's more desirable, a clean scratch,nick-free field area or some nicks and scratches,but a coin with better detail on the known wear areas? For sure the 'graded' coin has better eye appeal due to the shiny mirror-like field,but with a loupe,my other coins have less worn-out details,(ear lobe,eyebrow,etc)
Can't figure out why it was given a grade of MS-64,with the third and four pair of leaves worn away,also hair around the ear is worn?.Sorry for the long post! Not complaining,just curious?!
Thanks,Hot Brass
I have a few Canadian silver dollars, Queen Elizabeth II 1953-1964....one which has been graded by a third party grading service which gave this particular dollar a MS-64 grade.
My other dollar coins that have the same effigy,but different dates,certainly have better detail than the TPG one,particularly the third-from-bottom pair of laurel leaves,which are basically worn away on the 'graded' coin,but on my other coins the whole five pairs of leaves and the leaf on the end is still visible.
The only difference is the field area ( I think that's what it's called),or the area that has nothing on it,around the image is more shiny and less 'nick-free' on the "graded" coin... so what's more desirable, a clean scratch,nick-free field area or some nicks and scratches,but a coin with better detail on the known wear areas? For sure the 'graded' coin has better eye appeal due to the shiny mirror-like field,but with a loupe,my other coins have less worn-out details,(ear lobe,eyebrow,etc)
Can't figure out why it was given a grade of MS-64,with the third and four pair of leaves worn away,also hair around the ear is worn?.Sorry for the long post! Not complaining,just curious?!
Thanks,Hot Brass