Of course it's not a 1936 dot.

Post Reply
charleyboy
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 7:35 pm

Of course it's not a 1936 dot.

Post by charleyboy » Thu Jul 12, 2018 6:35 am

Of course it's not a 1936 dot.
Attachments
dot.JPG
dot.JPG (48.09 KiB) Viewed 12020 times

troubadour
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:46 pm

Re: Of course it's not a 1936 dot.

Post by troubadour » Thu Jul 12, 2018 8:32 am

only 3 exist and i doubt there is another one out there

coinguy
Posts: 305
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2016 10:03 am

Re: Of course it's not a 1936 dot.

Post by coinguy » Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:38 am

Your right, It's not.
The dot should be further to the right .
As stated, there are only three known to exist.

henrysmedford
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:44 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Of course it's not a 1936 dot.

Post by henrysmedford » Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:17 pm

In 2012 when going through roll in the US we found a 1936 with a rust dot. :lol:


Image

Microscope
Image


Real US$ 400K
Image

Post Reply