Agree. There is no premium for newer consecutive numbers.

The website is incorrect.
What you see on the ICCS website is correct.

It is hard to give a grade on currency from a picture especially when you only show one side shot through the holder but I can't see anything that would be worth the cost of grading as grading would cost more than the value of the currency. Nice to win but nothing of great value. 1967 Dollar- Very c...

Welcome to the Forum
Yes, it looks like a small die chip. Not an uncommon occurance.

I just ordered both the colour and plain today. Should be a popular coin.

As stated, you need 4 zeros and preferably 5 or more to be considered a low serial number.
There were over 890 million printed in that series so there is no extra value above face.
Keep as a cheap souvenir of bygone days.

Welcome to the Forum.
If you post a picture here, someone will be able to tell you if it is legitimate. Remember, it has to be exactly as the photo, not just close.

That is the Large Denticle Variety.
A Small Denticle is shorter and has more space between each Denticle.

There is no set "add on" value, a lot would depend on what coin you are referring to. A 1964 Silver Dollar could have an add on value of several hundred dollars whereas a 1964 silver quarter would be much lower. It all depends who wants it and what they are willing to pay. Also who is the Grader, th...

That is damage. That could not happen during the striking of the coin.

It is hard to grade currency from a photo, especially when only one side is shown and even that is not a complete picture as we cannot see the edges which is important. I will guess the grade to be VF in which case the book value would be about $300.00. That does not necessarily mean that is what yo...

Sorry but can't seem to open your image.

That is called a Low Serial Number (Anything 999 or less). Being a newer series and has some damage, it might be worth around $30.00 if you can find someone to buy it.

Looks like something has been spilled on it, possibly nail polish. Certainly wasn't done at the mint.

The lines were not caused by the rolling process or from being on the end of a roll. A coin wrapping machine leaves a mark closer to the rim. The first and third picture because of the inconsistency of the rings look like deliberate damage. The second picture outer rings MAY have been caused by some...