Nice set of radars!
No need for certification, the notes speak for themselves, a numerical grade won't get you much more money for them.

These were printed in sheets of 40 or 32.
Can you prove these were not cut by a third party?

As a rule of thumb for 1986 2 dollar notes, if the prefix is not listed the note is worth face value only, there are millions of them out there.

It doesn't matter how they sold them, or what they (erroneously) called them.
Like I said They were printed in sheets of 40 and cut from those.

These are not uncut sheets.
1973 $1 notes were printed in sheets of 40 in either 8x5 or 4x10 depending on the printer.
Your notes have been cut from 40 note sheets.

Weight?

The hands should be at the bottom and the bird horizontal for proper alignment.

Great closeup !

Your question does not make sense.
A variety can be a common coin.
The 1902H large H is a variety of 1902 yet it is the most common of all 1902 five cents.

You need a copy of the 2012 Charlton's to get the information you need.

Your note was issued as part of a set with a specimen toonie.
According to Charlton's it's worth $2
but I believe collectors would pay more

Prior to 1996 the default finish for specimen coins was brilliant relief on brilliant background.

The 2009 specimen set sells for about $50, the same price as in 2009.

The coin is not round, and it has a deformed rim.
Thus the coin is most likely damaged.

Nice clash!
https://www.coinsandcanada.com/coins-ar ... ies&id=108

Every coin struck after the die polishing event will have the same short waterlines. It's so rare that in less than fifteen minutes I found two unattributed on eBay, though in lower grade than the OP's coin. Had I found only one I would have jumped on it, but two, I'll hold off. not a wise investmen...

On this site both the 21 leaf and 22 leaf pictures are of the same coin, processed to make them appear different.
Look closely and see for yourself.

https://www.coinsandcanada.com/coins-pr ... 1858-1901